

I'm planning on it always front (north) view since it seems to be that way in Sol as well.
I need to sharpen it up a bit too, unless you guys think it looks fine?






It could use a tone down, I'm going to do more experimenting and other things need to be done before the release.From post: 154840, Topic: tid=10360, author=Destro wrote:That looks beautiful, Mecingo.
My own humble two cents, however - shouldn't it appear significantly dimmer than that, seeing as we're out on one of the far-flung edges of the galaxy, over 50,000 light years away from the center? I don't think there's ever been any orbital photographs that show the Milky Way that brilliantly, since the light of the local star should drown most of the ambient light out. It also seems like it's too close, but my sense of cosmic scale isn't completely accurate.
But then, there's a lot of realism being sacrificed for the sake of visual oohs and ahhs, so...










Sol is around half way between the centre and the edge of the spiral so the galactic central bulge is (Maars will like this) relatively speaking quite closeFrom post: 154840, Topic: tid=10360, author=Destro wrote:That looks beautiful, Mecingo. totally agree
My own humble two cents, however - shouldn't it appear significantly dimmer than that, seeing as we're out on one of the far-flung edges of the galaxy, over 50,000 light years away from the center? disagree with the edge bit - agree that to the unaided human eye it is dimmer but then so is the rest of the universe![]()
But then, there's a lot of realism being sacrificed for the sake of visual oohs and ahhs, so...totally agree again












would that be "setofffromheretolandonEarth.png"?From post: 155475, Topic: tid=10360, author=Marvin wrote:U2U sent ... due to the sensitive nature of some texture names. (And, since I never found out what the Sol texture is called in the Expansion, my suggestion is just that: a guess.)



It makes you think how exactly they know the Milky Way looks the way it does. It's not like they have the technology to fly out far enough to take the pictures we're used to see of it. Or even anything that comes close to it.From post: 155471, Topic: tid=10360, author=Mecingo wrote:I've been reading heavily on the Milky Way's brightness, the thing is I will not be able to get a definite brightness level because of many factors.
#1: Any object that is bright in the general area will cause a light pollution effect. Causing the overall visible light giving off from the Milky Way to be less.
#2: Distance from the Milky Way plays a heavy role. The farther away a you are from a galaxy the brighter it appears. So if you were in the dark deep void between galaxies the milky way would be heavily lit.
#3: Noticeable Nebula in the Milky Way around the center plays a heavy role on it's brightness, and since our solar system rotates around the center the Nebula, which causes it to vary in brightness through out the decades.
With that I came up with a decision. I will decrease the overall brightness just a tad. Actual realism is impossible (I was never aiming for that in the first place), also I can't find any images that are not enhanced or edited in some way. Heck not even an good pictures of the Milky Way from the Space Stations.
There will be one thing I can't change, the systems without Nebula will not have the Milky Way so will Andromeda. Then again Andromeda is a different galaxy
I still don't know the name of the Milky Way file for Sol if anyone has it I would gladly appreciate it that's all I need. Besides some final touches.


By taking 2D images of our galaxy from within, and measuring the distance of each star compared to us, people can generate an image of what our galaxy is supposed to look like.From post: 155497, Topic: tid=10360, author=Viper wrote:It makes you think how exactly they know the Milky Way looks the way it does. It's not like they have the technology to fly out far enough to take the pictures we're used to see of it. Or even anything that comes close to it.
