Design 1:
Design 2:
Design 3:
Design 4:
Design 5:







Less cluttered is good.From post: 132993, Topic: tid=9079, author=Vice wrote: That's a possibility also, was just trying to avoid the kind of cluttered look of the older design that some didn't seem to like.



Did same. Voted for 3 (cause it ties to Evochron), but the planet is a nice addition as per Thetiebers quote.From post: 132989, Topic: tid=9079, author=thetiebers wrote:I voted for number 3 but was wondering if you could or would think about a combo such as below? Just a stray thought.

From post: 133007, Topic: tid=9079, author=Tarl wrote:Reminds me of Tom Swift series of stories. Damn. Am I dating myself?


Yep, it seems to give a balanced effect that way.From post: 133014, Topic: tid=9079, author=Vice wrote: For those of you voting for 3, I'd like to verify that you'd prefer the lighting effect to come from the top and bottom rather than from the central icon structure in the middle as in design 5?


From post: 132989, Topic: tid=9079, author=thetiebers wrote:I voted for number 3 but was wondering if you could or would think about a combo such as below? Just a stray thought.










The planet view idea is really great, but I'd keep the E forever as the identity of the game.From post: 133024, Topic: tid=9079, author=Vice wrote: Very interesting, thanks for the votes and comments. Design #2 is obviously a lead choice (I've cleaned it up a bit). I think I'll keep design #5 on the list and add another possibility using a blank center area with a larger E in the middle. Then the rest will be dropped from consideration. So here are the three leading designs:
Design 1:
Design 2:
Design 3:
So of these three finalists, which looks best to you?


this!From post: 133041, Topic: tid=9079, author=Accountant wrote:Definitely number 1. Love that design.





